Maximum Distance in Arrays

The problem can be solved by iterating through the arrays and keeping track of the minimum and maximum values found so far, and also the maximum difference we’ve found so far.

Here’s a simple approach:

  1. Initialize variables: We need to keep track of the minimum value minVal and the maximum value maxVal found so far in the arrays, as well as the maximum distance maxDistance found so far.
  2. Iterate through arrays: For each array, we calculate two distances, one using the minimum element of the current array and the previous maximum value, and the other using the maximum element of the current array and the previous minimum value.
  3. Update values: After calculating the distances for the current array, we update the minVal, maxVal, and maxDistance as required.

Code:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
class Solution:
    def maxDistance(self, arrays: List[List[int]]) -> int:
        maxDistance = 0
        minVal = arrays[0][0]
        maxVal = arrays[0][-1]

        # Iterate from the second array onwards
        for i in range(1, len(arrays)):
            # Calculate distances
            distance1 = abs(arrays[i][-1] - minVal)
            distance2 = abs(arrays[i][0] - maxVal)

            # Update maxDistance
            maxDistance = max(maxDistance, distance1, distance2)

            # Update minVal and maxVal
            minVal = min(minVal, arrays[i][0])
            maxVal = max(maxVal, arrays[i][-1])

        return maxDistance

This approach runs in linear time with respect to the total number of elements in all arrays, as we are just iterating through the arrays once. For the example arrays = [[1,2,3],[4,5],[1,2,3]], the result would be 4.

Identifying Problem Isomorphism

“Maximum Distance in Arrays” can be approximately mapped to “Shortest Word Distance II”.

Reasoning:

In the “Maximum Distance in Arrays” problem, we have to find the maximum absolute difference between elements from different arrays. This involves finding the minimum and maximum values in these arrays and computing their difference.

In the “Shortest Word Distance II” problem, the task is to find the minimum absolute difference between the indices of two given words in a list of words. The primary objective of both problems is to compute the absolute difference.

There’s a difference: one aims to maximize this difference, while the other aims to minimize it.

“Shortest Word Distance II” is simpler in the sense that it only deals with one list and two words to compare, while “Maximum Distance in Arrays” requires handling multiple arrays and finding the maximum and minimum elements across all these arrays.

The mapping is approximate because, while both problems deal with the concept of distance (in one form or another), the exact elements being compared and the goal of the comparison (minimization vs maximization) are quite different.

10 Prerequisite LeetCode Problems

For “624. Maximum Distance in Arrays”, the following are a good preparation:

  1. “121. Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock” - It introduces the idea of tracking the minimum and maximum values, which is a strategy applicable to the given problem.

  2. “53. Maximum Subarray” - The Kadane’s algorithm introduced here, although not directly applicable, allows understanding of the dynamic behavior of maximums in an array.

  3. “88. Merge Sorted Array” - It helps in understanding how to handle sorted arrays, which is directly relevant to the given problem.

  4. “167. Two Sum II - Input array is sorted” - This problem reinforces understanding of operations on sorted arrays.

  5. “215. Kth Largest Element in an Array” - Getting used to array operations, including partitioning and selecting elements based on certain criteria.

  6. “283. Move Zeroes” - Provides practice on array manipulation which is an important skill to have when solving problems like these.

  7. “414. Third Maximum Number” - It involves working with the maximum elements in an array, which is a necessary operation for this problem.

  8. “349. Intersection of Two Arrays” - This problem helps in understanding how to work with two different arrays, which is relevant to the given problem.

  9. “26. Remove Duplicates from Sorted Array” - It aids in understanding the characteristics of sorted arrays.

  10. “122. Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock II” - The problem involves identifying peaks and valleys in an array, which could be helpful in understanding maximum distance.

These focus on manipulating sorted arrays, identifying and comparing maximum and minimum values, which are needed to solve the given problem.

Problem Classification

The problem falls under the domain of “Array Manipulation and Computation”. Specifically, it is a problem that deals with searching for maximum and minimum elements in multiple arrays to find the maximum distance between any two elements.

  1. Multiple Arrays: Given m arrays that are sorted in ascending order.
  2. Distance Calculation: The distance between two integers a and b is defined as |a - b|.
  3. Pick Two Integers: Must pick one integer from two different arrays.
  4. Constraints: Constraints on the length of each array and the ranges of the integers are provided.
  5. Maximum Distance: The task is to return the maximum distance.
  • Search Problem: We’re searching through multiple arrays for two numbers that maximize a certain function (distance).
  • Constraint Satisfaction: We must satisfy constraints such as picking one integer from two different arrays and adhering to given lengths and ranges.
  • Optimization Problem: We’re optimizing for the maximum distance.

This problem incorporates elements of search, constraint satisfaction, and optimization, making it a multi-faceted computational problem.

Clarification Questions

  1. Array Length Uniformity: Do all the arrays have the same length, or can they differ?
  2. Array Element Uniqueness: Can elements within a single array be repeated?
  3. Multiple Maximal Pairs: If there are multiple pairs of integers that yield the same maximum distance, do we need to report all of them or just one?
  4. Array Count: Is there a minimum or maximum number of arrays that will be provided?
  5. Empty Arrays: Can any of the given arrays be empty?
  6. Negative Numbers: Can the arrays contain negative numbers, or will they only be positive?
  7. Output Format: Is there a specific output format required for the maximum distance?
  8. Time Complexity: Are there any time complexity constraints we should be aware of?
  9. Memory Constraints: Are there any limitations on the amount of memory that can be used?
  10. Real-world Context: Is this problem modeled after a real-world scenario, and if so, understanding what that is might provide insights into solving it?

These questions aim to remove any ambiguities and constraints that might not have been fully detailed in the initial problem description.

Identifying Problem Isomorphism

Finding an isomorphism for a problem means identifying a structure that maps one-to-one onto the structure of another problem or system, preserving relationships.

In this problem, you’re looking to maximize the distance between two picked integers from separate sorted arrays. This is similar to the more generalized problem of maximizing a certain “value” by choosing one element each from separate sets, while following a specific rule (in this case, the rule is the calculation of distance via absolute difference).

One isomorphism for this problem could be the task of choosing two points on separate lines in a Cartesian coordinate system such that the distance between them is maximized. Here, the lines represent the sorted arrays, and the points represent the integers in those arrays. The goal is to find two points, one on each line, that maximize the “distance,” which in the original problem is the absolute difference between the two integers.

The relationships preserved here are:

  • The choice of one element from each set (or one point from each line).
  • The rule of calculating the “value” we’re trying to maximize (distance in both cases).
  • The constraint that the sets are ordered (lines are sorted in the Cartesian system).

Identifying such isomorphisms can provide additional insights into the problem and help in constructing a solution.

Based on maximizing a value through specific selections from multiple sets or arrays.

  1. Maximum Gap: Similar in that it’s about finding the maximum absolute difference between elements, though usually within a single array.

  2. Two Sum: Involves choosing elements from a single array to achieve a target sum, the concept of making selections is similar.

  3. Kth Smallest Element in a Sorted Matrix: You’re choosing elements from sorted arrays, but with a different objective.

  4. Find the Duplicate Number: Similar in that it works with sorted or unsorted arrays to find a specific value.

  5. Merge Intervals: Deals with sorted arrays and ranges, though the objective is different.

  6. Search in Rotated Sorted Array: Utilizes a sorted array, similar to your individual m arrays.

  7. Longest Consecutive Sequence: Focuses on finding a sequence, which requires understanding the distances between integers.

  8. 3Sum Closest: Involves choosing elements from an array to achieve a target sum, another problem requiring selections.

  9. Container With Most Water: You’re trying to maximize an area (analogous to distance) by selecting two lines (analogous to integers in your case).

  10. Maximum Product of Three Numbers: Similar in choosing numbers to maximize a product, so the notion of maximizing a value is shared.

While these problems share some similarities with your problem, the techniques used to solve them might differ based on specific constraints and requirements.

Problem Analysis and Key Insights

  1. Multiple Sorted Arrays: The problem involves multiple arrays, and each of them is sorted. This could potentially simplify our search for the maximum distance.

  2. Maximum Distance: The goal is to find the maximum absolute difference between two integers, each selected from a different array.

  3. Array Length Variation: Each array can have a different length, ranging from 1 to 500. This makes it unlikely that a straightforward pair-by-pair comparison between arrays will be efficient.

  4. Value Ranges: The integers in the arrays range from -10^4 to 10^4, indicating that we have to handle both positive and negative numbers.

  5. Constraints: The number of arrays (m) and their size constraints (at most 10^5 integers in total) suggest that an algorithm with a time complexity worse than O(n log n) may not be efficient enough.

These insights can guide us towards efficient algorithms for solving the problem, for instance, by exploiting the sorted nature of the arrays.

Problem Boundary

The scope of the problem is confined to the following:

  1. Input: You’re given ’m’ sorted arrays, each of varying lengths from 1 to 500.

  2. Output: You need to return a single integer representing the maximum distance (defined as the absolute difference) between any two integers picked from two different arrays.

  3. Constraints:

    • The number of arrays ’m’ ranges from 2 to 10^5.
    • Each integer in the arrays is between -10^4 and 10^4.
    • The total number of integers across all arrays will be at most 10^5.
  4. Functional Requirements:

    • Each array is sorted in ascending order.
    • The selected integers must come from two different arrays.
  5. Performance: Due to the constraints, the algorithm should ideally have a time complexity not worse than O(n log n).

  6. Deterministic Output: The problem is deterministic, meaning for the same input, the output will always be the same, which is the maximum distance as per the defined conditions.

  7. No External Dependencies: The problem is self-contained and doesn’t require any external libraries or tools.

  8. Single Objective: The problem has a single objective, which is to maximize the distance as defined.

The scope is fairly well-defined, focusing on algorithmic efficiency to find the maximum possible distance as per the given conditions.

Establishing the boundary of this problem involves understanding its limits and constraints, so that we can develop a solution within those boundaries. Here’s how:

  1. Input Boundary:

    • Minimum of 2 arrays and a maximum of 10^5 arrays.
    • Each array has a minimum length of 1 and a maximum length of 500.
    • Integer values range from -10^4 to 10^4.
  2. Output Boundary:

    • The output is a single integer, which is the maximum possible distance.
  3. Algorithmic Boundary:

    • Since the maximum number of integers can be 10^5 and arrays are sorted, an algorithm with time complexity not worse than O(n log n) should be feasible.
  4. Functional Boundary:

    • You can only pick one integer from each array.
    • The integers have to come from two different arrays.
    • The distance is calculated as an absolute difference.
  5. Data Structure Boundary:

    • Given the sorting constraint and the number of arrays, consider using data structures that maintain order efficiently, like heaps or balanced trees, if needed.
  6. Edge Cases:

    • Cases where all arrays contain the same integers.
    • Cases where one or more arrays contain only a single integer.
    • Cases where the maximum and minimum integers are in the same array.
  7. State Boundary:

    • The problem doesn’t mention any change in state or external factors affecting it, making it deterministic.

By understanding these boundaries, you can focus your solution strategy to work effectively within these limits.

Distilling the Problem to Its Core Elements

  1. Fundamental Concept or Principle:

    • This problem fundamentally revolves around the concept of “Maximum Difference” between two sets of sorted integers.
  2. Simplest Description:

    • Imagine you have several lists of numbers, each sorted from smallest to largest. You can pick one number from two different lists and find the difference between them. Your goal is to find the biggest difference you can get this way.
  3. Core Problem:

    • The core problem is to find the maximum distance, or absolute difference, between two integers that come from two different sorted arrays.
  4. Key Components:

    • Multiple sorted arrays.
    • Choice of one integer from each of two different arrays.
    • Calculation of absolute difference between chosen integers.
    • Finding the maximum such absolute difference.
  5. Minimal Set of Operations:

    • Retrieve the minimum and maximum integers from each array.
    • Compare these minima and maxima across arrays to find the largest absolute difference.
    • Return the largest absolute difference.

By breaking down the problem this way, you simplify its components, making it easier to tackle each part individually before assembling them into a complete solution.

Visual Model of the Problem

To visualize the problem, consider each array as a separate horizontal line on a 2D plane. On each line, plot the integers as points. Now, imagine lines connecting points from different arrays to each other. Your task is to find the longest such line, representing the maximum distance.

  1. Horizontal Lines: Each array is represented by a horizontal line.

    • Array 1: —————
    • Array 2: ——————
    • Array 3: ———–
  2. Points: The integers in each array are represented as points on the horizontal line.

    • Array 1: —-1—-2—-3—–
    • Array 2: ——4—-5——-
    • Array 3: —-1—-2—-3—–
  3. Connecting Lines: Imagine lines between points on different arrays.

    • Connect 1 from Array 1 to 5 in Array 2. The line represents |5-1| = 4.
    • Connect 3 from Array 1 to 5 in Array 2. The line represents |5-3| = 2.
    • …and so on.
  4. Longest Line: The longest line among these represents the maximum distance.

This visualization helps to conceptualize the task of finding the maximum distance as finding the longest line connecting points from different arrays.

Problem Restatement

You have a list containing multiple arrays. Each of these arrays is sorted in increasing order. Your goal is to pick one number from two different arrays and calculate the absolute difference between these numbers. The task is to find the largest such absolute difference possible.

Requirements:

  • You must pick numbers from two different arrays.
  • Each array is sorted in ascending order.

Constraints:

  • There are at least two arrays and at most 105 arrays.
  • Each array has at least one integer and at most 500 integers.
  • The integers range from -10,000 to 10,000.

Abstract Representation of the Problem

You have a collection of ordered lists, each containing numerical elements. The objective is to find the maximum absolute difference between any two elements, such that these elements come from different lists.

Key Elements:

  • Collection of ordered lists.
  • Numerical elements in each list.
  • Two chosen elements must be from different lists.
  • Objective is to maximize absolute difference.

This abstract representation isolates the key aspects of the problem and strips away any specific contextual details. The goal is to highlight the computational task at hand: maximizing an absolute difference under specific constraints.

Terminology

  1. Sorted Arrays: The input consists of arrays sorted in ascending order. Understanding that the arrays are sorted can guide optimization techniques. In a sorted array, the smallest and largest elements are at the ends, which could be exploited for efficient calculation.

  2. Absolute Difference: The term refers to the non-negative difference between two numbers, calculated as |a - b|. In this problem, you are asked to maximize this value, given specific constraints.

  3. Constraints: These are the rules that the input and output must obey. In this problem, constraints like the length of arrays and range of integers can affect the approach and complexity of the solution.

Understanding these specialized terms can help one to frame a suitable approach for solving the problem. Knowing what “sorted” means can suggest more efficient algorithms, understanding “absolute difference” clarifies what exactly needs to be maximized, and recognizing the “constraints” helps in crafting a solution that is both correct and efficient.

Problem Simplification and Explanation

Let’s break down the problem into its essential components:

  1. Multiple Lists: Think of these as different rows of numbers on a scoreboard. Each row is sorted in increasing order.

  2. Picking Numbers: You are allowed to choose one number from each row but from different rows, much like how you’d pick a player from different teams in a sports draft.

  3. Distance: The goal is to maximize the difference between the two numbers you’ve picked. Imagine it like stretching a rubber band between two points; you want to stretch it as far as you can.

Metaphor

Let’s use a metaphor of “treasure hunting on different islands.” Each island (array) has buried treasures (numbers), and they are sorted from least to most valuable. Your goal is to find two treasures from two different islands that, when compared, give you the most significant “thrill” (distance). The thrill is measured by the absolute difference in their value. You’d naturally pick the most valuable treasure from one island and the least valuable from another to maximize your thrill, right?

Interactions of Concepts

  • You look through each row (array) on the scoreboard (list of arrays).
  • You can pick only one number from each row, but from different rows.
  • You calculate the distance (absolute difference) between the numbers you’ve picked.
  • You aim to maximize this distance within the given constraints.

Understanding these core elements and their interactions will guide your approach to solving this problem.

Constraints

Let’s identify some useful characteristics based on the problem statement and constraints:

  1. Sorted Arrays: Each array is sorted in ascending order. This means the smallest and largest elements are easy to identify; they are just the first and last elements in each array.

  2. Positive Array Length: Each array has at least one element, meaning we can always select one element from each array without worrying about empty sets.

  3. Limited Number Range: The numbers in the arrays range from -10,000 to 10,000. While this might not directly help in optimization, it gives us an idea of the potential maximum distance (20,000).

  4. Distinct Arrays: We can only pick one number from each array, but from different arrays. This allows us to eliminate the need to handle multiple picks from the same array.

  5. Maximize Distance: We’re trying to maximize the absolute difference between two picked numbers. Since arrays are sorted, you would naturally aim for the largest number in one array and the smallest in another.

  6. Number of Arrays (m): Knowing that m ranges from 2 to 105 can help you rule out algorithms that won’t scale well with the number of arrays.

By recognizing these characteristics, you can develop an approach that leverages them for an efficient solution. For instance, you might just need to scan the smallest and largest elements in each array to find the maximum distance, thanks to the sorted nature of the arrays.

Analyzing the constraints gives us valuable insights for problem-solving:

  1. Sorted Arrays: This makes it easier to find the minimum and maximum elements, which are essential for calculating the maximum distance.

  2. Array Lengths: With each array containing at least one element and at most 500 elements, we don’t have to worry about empty arrays and can safely assume that each array contributes to the distance calculation.

  3. Limited Number Range: The range of each element being between -10,000 and 10,000 provides a ceiling for the maximum distance possible, which is useful for setting initial variables or making early exits in some algorithms.

  4. Fixed Number of Arrays: Knowing that m is at least 2 but no more than 105 tells us that we’re working with a manageable number of arrays. Algorithms with complexity based on m should be reasonable.

  5. Upper Bound of Total Integers: The total number of integers across all arrays won’t exceed 105. This hints that an algorithm with time complexity up to O(n log n) should be acceptable.

These constraints allow us to narrow down our algorithmic choices and enable optimizations. They also give a sense of the computational resources that will be needed to solve the problem efficiently.

Case Analysis

Additional test cases can help in understanding the problem better. Let’s explore some:

Category 1: Basic Scenarios

  1. Single-Element Arrays

    • Input: [[1], [2]]
    • Output: 1
    • Reasoning: Only one way to pick elements. The maximum distance will be |2 - 1| = 1.
  2. Same Elements in Different Arrays

    • Input: [[1, 2, 3], [3, 4, 5]]
    • Output: 4
    • Reasoning: The maximum distance can be found by picking 1 from the first array and 5 from the second array.

Category 2: Edge Cases

  1. Negative Numbers

    • Input: [[-1, 0], [1, 2]]
    • Output: 3
    • Reasoning: Maximum distance is between -1 and 2. Shows that negative numbers are not a hindrance.
  2. Large Gap Within an Array

    • Input: [[1, 1000], [2, 3]]
    • Output: 999
    • Reasoning: Even if there’s a large gap within an array, it won’t contribute to the maximum distance between elements from different arrays.

Category 3: Limit Conditions

  1. Maximum Number of Arrays

    • Input: 105 arrays with single element [1]
    • Output: 0
    • Reasoning: Tests the upper limit on the number of arrays. All arrays are the same, so distance is zero.
  2. Maximum Elements in an Array

    • Input: [[1, 2, 3, ..., 500], [501, 502, ..., 1000]]
    • Output: 999
    • Reasoning: Tests the upper limit on the number of elements in an array.

Category 4: Complexity

  1. Different Array Lengths
    • Input: [[1], [1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7]]
    • Output: 6
    • Reasoning: Highlights that arrays of different lengths can still contribute to the maximum distance (1 from first array and 7 from the last array).

These test cases will help to ensure that the solution handles a variety of scenarios, from the most straightforward to the more complex, including edge and boundary conditions.

Visualizing these cases can help in understanding the underlying patterns and constraints of the problem. Here are some ways to visualize the given test categories:

Category 1: Basic Scenarios

  1. Single-Element Arrays

    • Visual: Two dots on a number line, one at 1 and the other at 2.
    • Distance: One unit apart.
  2. Same Elements in Different Arrays

    • Visual: Two sequences on a number line, first ranging from 1 to 3, and the second from 3 to 5.
    • Distance: The farthest elements from each sequence are 1 and 5, four units apart.

Category 2: Edge Cases

  1. Negative Numbers

    • Visual: First sequence from -1 to 0, the second from 1 to 2.
    • Distance: Maximum distance between -1 and 2 (three units apart).
  2. Large Gap Within an Array

    • Visual: First sequence has elements at 1 and 1000. The second sequence has elements at 2 and 3.
    • Distance: Maximum distance is between 1 and 1000 (999 units apart).

Category 3: Limit Conditions

  1. Maximum Number of Arrays

    • Visual: 105 dots, all at the same point (1) on the number line.
    • Distance: All are at the same point, so distance is zero.
  2. Maximum Elements in an Array

    • Visual: Two long sequences, one from 1 to 500 and another from 501 to 1000.
    • Distance: Maximum distance is between 1 and 1000 (999 units apart).

Category 4: Complexity

  1. Different Array Lengths
    • Visual: Three sequences, first with one element at 1, second from 1 to 3, third from 4 to 7.
    • Distance: Maximum distance is between 1 and 7 (six units apart).

For visualization, you can plot these points on a number line or even use bar graphs to represent the elements from different arrays. Using colors can help distinguish between different arrays. The distance can be represented by arrows or lines connecting the chosen points.

Analyzing different cases yields several key insights:

  1. Basic Scenarios:

    • The distance is dictated by the outermost elements across different arrays.
  2. Edge Cases:

    • Negative numbers don’t pose a special condition; they’re just another point on the number line.
    • Large gaps within an array are irrelevant if the problem focuses only on distances between arrays.
  3. Limit Conditions:

    • A large number of arrays doesn’t inherently complicate the problem if they contain similar or identical elements.
    • A large number of elements within a single array also doesn’t complicate the problem; it’s the extreme elements in different arrays that matter.
  4. Complexity:

    • Different lengths in arrays do not add complexity, as long as the elements are sorted. The smallest and largest elements in each array are the primary points of interest.

These insights point toward focusing on the minimum and maximum elements in each array for a solution. The elements in the middle are not as relevant for solving this particular problem.

Identification of Applicable Theoretical Concepts

  1. Sort Order: The arrays are already sorted in ascending order. This simplifies the problem, as we don’t have to sort them to find the minimum and maximum elements.

  2. Absolute Difference: The metric for distance is the absolute difference, a straightforward operation with good computational properties.

  3. Greedy Algorithms: The nature of the problem lends itself to a greedy approach, where we can look at the maximum and minimum elements in each array and make optimal local decisions.

  4. Dynamic Programming: We can use dynamic programming to store the minimum and maximum elements encountered so far, thus avoiding redundant calculations.

  5. Two-Pointers Technique: Since we’re looking at sorted arrays, the two-pointers technique can help traverse arrays efficiently to find optimal pairs.

  6. Mathematical Bounds: The constraints specify numerical ranges for the elements. This could help in some optimization, although it’s not crucial for the primary solution.

  7. Time and Space Complexity: Understanding Big O notation will help you reason about the efficiency of your solution.

  8. Divide and Conquer: In a more complex variant of the problem, divide and conquer algorithms like QuickSelect might be useful to find the kth smallest or largest element across multiple arrays.

These mathematical and algorithmic concepts provide a toolkit to approach the problem in a systematic and optimized manner.

Simple Explanation

Imagine you have several buckets, and each bucket has some small stones in it. All the stones in one bucket are of the same size, but different buckets might have stones of different sizes. Your goal is to find two stones from two different buckets such that the size difference between them is as big as possible.

In simpler terms, you want to pick one stone from one bucket and another stone from a different bucket so that their sizes are as different as they can be. Then, you tell me how different those sizes are.

Problem Breakdown and Solution Methodology

Let’s break down the problem of finding the maximum distance between two integers picked from different arrays.

Approach to Solve the Problem:

Step 1: Prepare for Comparison

You start by looking at the first bucket (array) and note down the smallest and largest stones (smallest and largest numbers). Let’s call them min1 and max1.

Step 2: Initialize Variables

Keep track of the maximum difference you’ve found so far. Let’s call it max_diff. Initially, set it to zero.

Step 3: Go Through Other Buckets

Move on to the next bucket. Again, note down the smallest and largest stones in that bucket, min2 and max2.

Step 4: Calculate Differences

Calculate the difference between max2 and min1, and max1 and min2. Update max_diff if either of these differences is larger than what you have stored so far.

Step 5: Update Min and Max

Before moving on to the next bucket, update min1 and max1 to be the smallest and largest between the previous min1, max1 and current min2, max2.

Step 6: Repeat

Repeat Steps 3-5 for all buckets.

Step 7: Return the Result

The value stored in max_diff will be the maximum distance you can achieve.

Parameters’ Effect on the Solution:

  • The more buckets (arrays) you have, the longer it’ll take.
  • The size of each bucket affects how long it’ll take to find the smallest and largest stones in it.

Working Example:

Consider arrays = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [1, 2, 3]].

  1. First Bucket: min1 = 1, max1 = 3, max_diff = 0
  2. Second Bucket: min2 = 4, max2 = 5
    • Calculate differences: 5-1 = 4, 3-4 = 1
    • Update max_diff = 4
    • Update min1 = min(1, 4) = 1 and max1 = max(3, 5) = 5
  3. Third Bucket: min2 = 1, max2 = 3
    • Calculate differences: 5-1 = 4, 3-1 = 2
    • Update max_diff = 4 (no change)
    • Update min1 = min(1, 1) = 1 and max1 = max(5, 3) = 5

Final max_diff = 4.

This should give you a full understanding of how to approach this problem.

Inference of Problem-Solving Approach from the Problem Statement

Here are the key terms or concepts that shape the approach to solving this problem:

  1. Sorted Arrays: Each array is sorted in ascending order. This is important because it means the smallest and largest elements can be quickly identified, leading us to use a single-pass algorithm. It also tells us we don’t need to sort the arrays ourselves.

  2. Maximum Distance: This is our goal. It directs our focus toward comparing the smallest and largest elements between different arrays, as those will provide the maximum difference.

  3. Two Different Arrays: Each integer should come from a different array. This constraint prevents us from just finding the global maximum and minimum across all arrays, and means we need to keep track of minimums and maximums per array.

  4. Absolute Difference: This tells us what mathematical operation we need to perform to calculate the “distance” between two numbers, guiding us to use subtraction and absolute value operations.

  5. Constraints on Array Lengths and Elements: These indicate the problem’s scale and guide us toward looking for an efficient algorithm. Since the arrays can be quite long and numerous, this nudges us towards a linear-time solution.

Each of these key terms or concepts leads us to specific strategies or methods for solving the problem. For example, knowing the arrays are sorted guides us toward a single-pass algorithm. Knowing we need to find the “maximum distance” tells us to focus on the smallest and largest elements of each array, and so on.

To visualize the properties of the problem, you can use various types of tables or diagrams. Here’s how:

  1. Sorted Arrays: Create a table where each row represents an array. Seeing the sorted numbers in each row quickly illustrates that you can identify the minimum and maximum values easily.

    Array 1: | 1 | 2 | 3 |
    Array 2: | 4 | 5 |
    Array 3: | 1 | 2 | 3 |
    
  2. Maximum Distance: Draw arrows between elements from different arrays to represent possible distances. Long arrows signify greater distances.

    1 ------- 5 (Distance: 4)
    3 ------- 4 (Distance: 1)
    
  3. Two Different Arrays: Use color coding or different shapes to represent different arrays. This will visually enforce that you can only pick elements from different arrays.

    Array 1 (circles): ● ● ●
    Array 2 (squares): ■ ■
    
  4. Absolute Difference: Alongside each arrow (representing distance), you can have a box or annotation that shows the calculated absolute difference.

    1 ------- 5 [Absolute Diff: |5-1| = 4]
    
  5. Constraints on Array Lengths and Elements: Draw a boundary box around your table to represent the maximum array length or number of arrays, with annotations that mark these constraints.

    |<---------- Up to 500 elements ------------>|
    

By combining these visual elements, you can create a comprehensive diagram that encapsulates the key properties and constraints of the problem. This diagram will serve as a visual aid while you’re devising your algorithmic solution.

How did you infer from the problem statement that this problem can be solved using ?

Simple Explanation of the Proof

I’m having trouble understanding the proof of this algorithm. Could you explain it in a way that’s easy to understand?

Stepwise Refinement

  1. Stepwise Refinement

    1.1 Initialize Maximum Distance: Start by initializing a variable to store the maximum distance as zero.

    1.2 First Pass for Min and Max: Loop through each array to find the minimum and maximum values. Store these for each array.

    1.3 Second Pass for Distance: Loop through the arrays again, this time comparing every minimum with all other maximums to calculate the distances. Update the maximum distance whenever a larger one is found.

    1.4 Return Result: Once all combinations have been checked, return the maximum distance.

  2. Granular, Actionable Steps

    2.1 Initialize Variables: max_distance = 0, array_mins = [], array_maxs = [].

    2.2 First Pass Loop: - For each array in the list of arrays: - Find min_value and max_value. - Append min_value to array_mins. - Append max_value to array_maxs.

    2.3 Second Pass Loop: - For each min_value in array_mins: - For each max_value in array_maxs: - If they’re not from the same array: - Calculate distance = abs(max_value - min_value). - If distance > max_distance, then max_distance = distance.

    2.4 Return: Return max_distance.

  3. Independent Parts

    • Finding the minimum and maximum values of each array can be done independently. This step could be parallelized.

    • Calculating the distance for different pairs can also be done independently.

  4. Repeatable Patterns

    • Looping through each array to find the min and max is a repetitive pattern.

    • Calculating the distance between a minimum from one array and a maximum from another is also a repetitive task that we perform for every combination of two different arrays.

This way, the problem can be broken down into smaller, manageable steps. Each of these steps contributes to the overall solution.

Solution Approach and Analysis

  1. Initialize the Variables:

    • max_distance = 0: To store the maximum distance found.
  2. Collect Minimums and Maximums:

    • Loop through each array to find its minimum and maximum value.
    • Keep these in two separate lists: array_mins and array_maxs.
  3. Calculate Maximum Distance:

    • Loop through array_mins and array_maxs.
    • For each pair (min_value, max_value) where the values come from different arrays, calculate their absolute difference.
    • If this difference is greater than max_distance, update max_distance.
  4. Return the Result:

    • The final value of max_distance is the answer.

Metaphor

Think of each array as a box of differently-sized balls. We want to find two balls from two different boxes that are as different in size as possible.

Parameters and Their Effects

  • Number of Arrays (m): Increasing the number of arrays would increase the time complexity. You’ll have more combinations to consider.

  • Length of Each Array: Longer arrays won’t significantly change the approach, but it will take longer to find the min and max values for each one.

  • Value Range: The actual numbers in the arrays don’t affect our approach, as we’re interested in the distance (absolute difference), not the actual values.

Example Case

Let’s consider the example arrays = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [1, 2, 3]].

  1. Initialize: max_distance = 0.

  2. Collect Minimums and Maximums:

    • For [1, 2, 3], min = 1, max = 3.
    • For [4, 5], min = 4, max = 5.
    • For [1, 2, 3], min = 1, max = 3.
    • So, array_mins = [1, 4, 1] and array_maxs = [3, 5, 3].
  3. Calculate Maximum Distance:

    • abs(1 - 5) = 4
    • abs(1 - 3) = 2 (from the same array, so ignored)
    • abs(4 - 3) = 1
    • abs(4 - 1) = 3
    • Maximum is 4, so max_distance = 4.
  4. Return: The maximum distance is 4.

This approach works by breaking down the problem into smaller, more manageable parts, each contributing to find the maximum possible distance between two numbers from different arrays.

Identify Invariant

The invariant in this problem is that each individual array is sorted in ascending order. This invariant helps you in two ways:

  1. Quick Identification of Extremes: Since the arrays are sorted, you don’t have to search the entire array to find the minimum or maximum values. The minimum is the first element, and the maximum is the last element in each array.

  2. Bounds for Distance Calculation: The sorted nature of arrays implies that the minimum and maximum from each array can serve as bounds for possible distances. No other element in the array will give a greater distance than the distance calculated using these extremes.

Recognizing this invariant simplifies the problem and allows for an efficient solution. It guides you to focus on the minimum and maximum values of each array rather than considering all possible combinations of elements between arrays for distance calculation.

Identify Loop Invariant

What is the loop invariant in this problem?

Is invariant and loop invariant the same for this problem?

Identify Recursion Invariant

Is there an invariant during recursion in this problem?

Is invariant and invariant during recursion the same for this problem?

Thought Process

  1. Recognize Invariant: Notice that each array is sorted in ascending order. This is a crucial cue suggesting that we only need to consider the minimum and maximum elements from each array for maximum distance.

  2. Initialize Variables: Initialize variables to keep track of the maximum distance, the minimum and maximum values found so far.

  3. Iterate Through Arrays: Loop through the given arrays one by one. In each iteration:

    • Find Extremes: Quickly identify the minimum and maximum elements from the current array as they’re sorted.

    • Calculate Distance: Use the minimum and maximum elements from the current array to calculate distances with minimum and maximum values from other arrays seen so far.

    • Update Maximum Distance: Compare these distances with the current maximum distance. If greater, update the maximum distance.

    • Update Extremes: Update the global minimum and maximum values with the ones in the current array if necessary.

  4. Return Result: Once all arrays have been iterated, return the maximum distance found.

Code in Python

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
def maxDistance(arrays):
    max_distance = 0
    
    # Initialize with the first array
    min_val = arrays[0][0]
    max_val = arrays[0][-1]
    
    # Loop through the remaining arrays
    for i in range(1, len(arrays)):
        current_min = arrays[i][0]
        current_max = arrays[i][-1]
        
        # Calculate possible maximum distances
        max_distance = max(max_distance, abs(current_max - min_val), abs(max_val - current_min))
        
        # Update global minimum and maximum
        min_val = min(min_val, current_min)
        max_val = max(max_val, current_max)
        
    return max_distance

Insights

  • The sorted nature of the arrays helps in quickly identifying the extreme values (minimum and maximum), which are crucial in calculating the maximum distance.
  • Iterating through the arrays only once keeps the time complexity at O(m), where m is the number of arrays.

To solve the problem in Python3 within a class-based structure, you can implement the maxDistance method within the Solution class as follows:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
from typing import List

class Solution:
    def maxDistance(self, arrays: List[List[int]]) -> int:
        max_distance = 0

        # Initialize with the first array
        min_val = arrays[0][0]
        max_val = arrays[0][-1]

        # Loop through the remaining arrays
        for i in range(1, len(arrays)):
            current_min = arrays[i][0]
            current_max = arrays[i][-1]
            
            # Calculate possible maximum distances
            max_distance = max(max_distance, abs(current_max - min_val), abs(max_val - current_min))
            
            # Update global minimum and maximum
            min_val = min(min_val, current_min)
            max_val = max(max_val, current_max)
            
        return max_distance

This class contains the maxDistance method, which encapsulates the logic to find the maximum distance based on the given problem statement. The list arrays is of type List[List[int]], and the method returns an integer value representing the maximum distance. The core algorithm remains the same as the previously explained stand-alone function.

Establishing Preconditions and Postconditions

  1. Parameters:

    • Inputs: The input to the method is arrays, a list of lists containing integers.
    • Types: arrays is of type List[List[int]].
    • Representation: Each inner list in arrays represents a sorted array of integers. You can pick one integer from two different arrays and calculate their distance.
  2. Preconditions:

    • State: There is no specific state the program must be in before this method is called.
    • Constraints: The problem statement provides constraints. For example, 2 <= m <= 105 where m is the length of arrays. Also, 1 <= arrays[i].length <= 500 and -104 <= arrays[i][j] <= 104.
  3. Method Functionality:

    • Expected Action: The method is expected to find the maximum distance between any two integers picked from two different arrays in arrays.
    • Interaction: The method solely operates on the input arrays to compute the maximum distance and doesn’t interact with any other state of the program.
  4. Postconditions:

    • State: The state of the program remains unchanged as the method doesn’t have any side effects.
    • Return Value: The return value is an integer that represents the maximum distance between two integers picked from two different arrays.
  5. Error Handling:

    • Response to Unmet Preconditions: The method does not explicitly handle errors regarding preconditions. However, it’s assumed that the input will meet the constraints specified in the problem statement.
    • Exception Handling: No exceptions are thrown; the method assumes valid input based on problem constraints.

Problem Decomposition

  1. Problem Understanding:

    • In my own words: Given multiple sorted arrays, the goal is to pick one integer from two different arrays and find the maximum possible distance (absolute difference) between them.
  2. Initial Breakdown:

    • Major Parts:
      1. Reading the input arrays.
      2. Identifying potential integer pairs from different arrays.
      3. Calculating the distance for each pair.
      4. Identifying the maximum distance.
  3. Subproblem Refinement:

    • For Reading Input: No further refinement needed.
    • For Identifying Pairs:
      • Loop through each array to pick an integer.
      • Loop through all other arrays to pick a second integer.
    • For Calculating Distance:
      • Use the absolute difference formula.
    • For Identifying Maximum:
      • Maintain a variable to store the maximum distance found so far.
  4. Task Identification:

    • Looping through arrays to pick integers and calculating distance are repeated tasks.
  5. Task Abstraction:

    • Picking integers: General enough but specific to the problem.
    • Calculating Distance: The absolute difference is a clear, reusable task.
    • Identifying Maximum: Reusable task in the context of maximum distance.
  6. Method Naming:

    • Picking Integers: pick_integer_from_array
    • Calculating Distance: calculate_distance
    • Identifying Maximum: find_max_distance
  7. Subproblem Interactions:

    • Order: Start by reading input, then identify pairs, calculate their distance, and finally find the maximum.
    • Dependencies: The identification of pairs depends on reading the input. Calculating distance depends on the pairs identified. Finding the maximum distance depends on the distances calculated.

From Brute Force to Optimal Solution

Brute Force Solution

Steps:

  1. Initialize a variable max_distance to store the maximum distance, starting at 0.
  2. Loop through each array to pick an integer.
  3. For each integer picked, loop through all other arrays to pick a second integer.
  4. Calculate the distance between the two integers using their absolute difference.
  5. Compare this distance to max_distance and update max_distance if the new distance is greater.

Python Code:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
from typing import List

def maxDistance(arrays: List[List[int]]) -> int:
    max_distance = 0
    for i, arr1 in enumerate(arrays):
        for j, arr2 in enumerate(arrays):
            if i == j:
                continue
            for x in arr1:
                for y in arr2:
                    distance = abs(x - y)
                    max_distance = max(max_distance, distance)
    return max_distance

Inefficiencies:

  • Time Complexity: O(m^2 * n^2) where m is the number of arrays and n is the average size of each array. This is quite slow.
  • Space Complexity: O(1), not using any extra space other than input and variables.

Optimized Solution

Steps Towards Optimization:

  1. Observe that each array is sorted. The maximum distance will involve either the smallest or largest elements in any given array.
  2. Instead of checking every combination of integers between arrays, just consider the smallest and largest integers in each array.
  3. Maintain four variables to keep track of the smallest and largest elements encountered so far and their respective arrays to avoid picking two integers from the same array.

Python Code:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
def maxDistance(arrays: List[List[int]]) -> int:
    min_val = arrays[0][0]
    max_val = arrays[0][-1]
    
    min_array_idx = max_array_idx = 0
    
    max_distance = 0
    
    for i, arr in enumerate(arrays[1:], start=1):
        if i != min_array_idx:
            max_distance = max(max_distance, abs(arr[-1] - min_val))
        
        if i != max_array_idx:
            max_distance = max(max_distance, abs(arr[0] - max_val))
            
        if arr[0] < min_val:
            min_val = arr[0]
            min_array_idx = i
            
        if arr[-1] > max_val:
            max_val = arr[-1]
            max_array_idx = i
    
    return max_distance

Improvements:

  • Time Complexity: Reduced to O(m), where m is the number of arrays.
  • Space Complexity: Remains O(1).

Each optimization step leans on the sorted nature of the input arrays, drastically reducing the time complexity from O(m^2 * n^2) to O(m), while keeping the space complexity the same.

Code Explanation and Design Decisions

  1. Initial Parameters:

    • arrays: A list of sorted integer lists. These represent the datasets among which we want to find the maximum distance.
  2. Primary Loop:

    • The loop iterates over each array in arrays starting from the second array (arrays[1:]). Each iteration is responsible for updating the maximum distance by considering the smallest and largest values of the current array and comparing them with the smallest and largest values found so far.
  3. Conditions Within the Loop:

    • if i != min_array_idx: This checks that the current array is not the one with the smallest value seen so far. This is necessary because we want to find the maximum distance between two different arrays.
    • if i != max_array_idx: Similarly, this checks that the current array is not the one with the largest value seen so far.
    • if arr[0] < min_val: Checks if the smallest value of the current array is smaller than the smallest value encountered so far.
    • if arr[-1] > max_val: Checks if the largest value of the current array is larger than the largest value encountered so far.
  4. Updates Within the Loop:

    • max_distance = max(...): Updates the maximum distance so far by considering the current array.
    • min_val, max_val: Update the smallest and largest values seen so far, if needed.
    • min_array_idx, max_array_idx: Update the index of the array that holds the smallest and largest values.
  5. Invariant:

    • max_distance will always store the maximum distance found so far, and min_val and max_val will always store the smallest and largest elements found so far. This ensures we are always prepared to update max_distance correctly.
  6. Significance of Final Output:

    • The final output is the maximum distance between any two elements from two different arrays within the list of arrays. This satisfies the problem’s requirement to find this maximum distance.

Coding Constructs

  1. High-Level Strategies:

    • The code uses a greedy approach. It keeps track of the minimum and maximum elements found so far in the list of arrays, as well as the maximum distance between elements from two different arrays. As it iterates through each array, it updates these variables as needed.
  2. Explaining to a Non-Programmer:

    • The code looks through several lists of numbers to find the biggest gap between a small number in one list and a large number in another list.
  3. Logical Elements:

    • Iteration: Looping through each array in the list.
    • Conditional Branching: Checking various conditions to update minimum, maximum, and maximum distance.
    • Variables: Storing and updating current minimum and maximum values and their corresponding array indices, and the maximum distance.
  4. Algorithmic Approach in Plain English:

    • Start by setting initial smallest and largest numbers from the first array and an initial maximum distance as zero.
    • Loop through each remaining array.
      • Compare its smallest and largest numbers with the current smallest and largest numbers.
      • Update them if necessary.
      • Also, find the largest distance between this array’s smallest or largest number and the current smallest or largest number from a different array. Update the maximum distance if a bigger one is found.
  5. Key Steps or Operations:

    • Iterating through each array in the list of arrays.
    • For each array, finding its smallest and largest element.
    • Comparing these with the smallest and largest elements found so far and updating them if needed.
    • Calculating the maximum distance between elements from different arrays and updating it if a larger distance is found.
  6. Algorithmic Patterns:

    • Greedy Algorithm: At each step, the code makes the local optimal choice by updating the maximum distance, smallest and largest elements.
    • Iteration: Looping through each array to gather required information.
    • Conditional Logic: Employed to determine when to update variables.

Language Agnostic Coding Drills

  1. Dissecting the Code: Distinct Concepts

    • Variable Initialization: Defining and initializing variables.
    • Loop Iteration: Using loops to traverse arrays.
    • Conditional Checks: Using if-else conditions to check criteria.
    • Mathematical Operations: Performing arithmetic calculations.
    • Array Indexing: Accessing elements from an array using indices.
    • Comparison Operations: Comparing variables to find minimum, maximum, etc.
    • Variable Updating: Updating variable values based on new information.
  2. Difficulty Order and Descriptions

    • Variable Initialization: Easiest because it’s the starting point for any program and does not involve any complexity.
    • Array Indexing: Slightly more complex because it requires understanding how arrays are structured.
    • Mathematical Operations: Introduces arithmetic operations, which can sometimes involve understanding precedence rules.
    • Loop Iteration: Requires understanding of loops and their control structures.
    • Comparison Operations: Requires understanding how to compare different variables and constants.
    • Conditional Checks: Requires logical reasoning to understand and create different branches of code.
    • Variable Updating: Most complex as it requires understanding the current state of the problem and updating variables accordingly.
  3. Problem-Solving Approach: From Statement to Solution

    • Understanding the Problem: First, understand what is being asked: finding the maximum distance between elements in different arrays.

    • Variable Initialization: Initialize variables for storing the maximum distance, the smallest and largest numbers, and their corresponding arrays.

    • Loop Iteration: A loop is necessary to go through each array in the list of arrays. This contributes to both gathering information and performing calculations.

    • Array Indexing: To loop through each array, we need to index into it to access its elements.

    • Comparison Operations: As we access elements, we’ll need to compare them to find out which is smallest and largest. We also need to compare distances to find the maximum.

    • Mathematical Operations: We calculate distances between numbers, requiring subtraction and possibly absolute value calculations.

    • Conditional Checks: We must determine when to update the variables holding our smallest and largest numbers and maximum distance. This is where conditional checks come in.

    • Variable Updating: Based on these conditions, the state variables (smallest and largest numbers and maximum distance) are updated.

Each of these drills contributes to either navigating the data structure, making logical decisions based on the information at hand, or performing calculations to find the solution. Together, they form a coherent strategy for solving the problem.

Targeted Drills in Python

General Coding Drills

  1. Variable Initialization

    1
    2
    3
    4
    
    # Initialize an integer variable
    x = 0
    # Initialize a list
    my_list = []
    
  2. Array Indexing

    1
    2
    
    # Access the first element in a list
    first_element = my_list[0]
    
  3. Mathematical Operations

    1
    2
    3
    4
    
    # Add two numbers
    sum = x + 5
    # Subtract two numbers
    diff = 10 - x
    
  4. Loop Iteration

    1
    2
    3
    
    # Loop through each element in a list
    for element in my_list:
        print(element)
    
  5. Comparison Operations

    1
    2
    3
    
    # Compare two numbers
    if x > 5:
        print("x is greater than 5")
    
  6. Conditional Checks

    1
    2
    3
    
    # Check if a number is even
    if x % 2 == 0:
        print("x is even")
    
  7. Variable Updating

    1
    2
    
    # Increment x by 1
    x += 1
    

Problem-Specific Drills

  1. Finding Minimum and Maximum in an Array
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    
    # Initialize variables
    min_val = float('inf')
    max_val = float('-inf')
    
    # Loop to find min and max
    for num in my_list:
        min_val = min(min_val, num)
        max_val = max(max_val, num)
    
    Essential because our main problem requires finding minimum and maximum values in arrays to calculate distances.

Integrating Drills to Solve the Problem

  1. Initialize Variables: Use the Variable Initialization drill to initialize variables for minimum, maximum, and maximum distance.

  2. Loop Iteration: Loop through each array in the list of arrays. This can be accomplished using the Loop Iteration drill.

  3. Array Indexing & Finding Min, Max: Inside the loop, use Array Indexing and the problem-specific drill to find the minimum and maximum values in each array.

  4. Mathematical Operations & Comparison Operations: Calculate the possible new maximum distances using Mathematical Operations. Use Comparison Operations to compare them with the current maximum distance.

  5. Conditional Checks & Variable Updating: Depending on the comparison, use Conditional Checks to decide whether to update the maximum distance and the minimum and maximum values, using Variable Updating.

  6. Final Output: Once the loop is done, the variable storing the maximum distance will hold your answer.

By completing each of these drills and understanding their order and purpose, you should be able to integrate them to form a complete solution to the problem.

Q&A

Similar Problems

Here are 10 problems that use similar underlying concepts:

  1. Maximum Product of Three Numbers: This problem requires you to find the maximum product that can be made by picking three numbers from an array, similar to how you had to find maximum and minimum values in our original problem.

  2. Kth Largest Element in an Array: This problem involves sorting an array or finding maximum/minimum elements multiple times, much like how you had to find the minimum and maximum values in the arrays for maximum distance.

  3. Find Peak Element: This problem asks for finding a peak in an array which involves going through the array and comparing neighboring elements, similar to how you find maximum and minimum values.

  4. Meeting Rooms II: This problem involves sorting time intervals and then iterating through them to find out how many meeting rooms are needed. It’s akin to iterating through arrays to find maximum and minimum values.

  5. Container With Most Water: This problem requires you to find two lines that together with the x-axis form a container that can hold the most water. It’s similar in that you’re looking for two numbers that satisfy a particular condition for a maximum or minimum value.

  6. Minimum Size Subarray Sum: This problem requires iterating through an array to find a subarray of minimum size that has a sum greater than a given value. The iteration and comparison elements are similar to the original problem.

  7. Maximum Subarray: Here, you have to find a contiguous subarray with the largest sum. The requirement to keep track of a ‘maximum’ value as you iterate through an array is a key similarity.

  8. Longest Continuous Increasing Subsequence: This problem requires you to find the length of the longest increasing subsequence in an array. It involves iterating through the array and maintaining a variable to track the maximum length, similar to how the maximum distance is tracked in the original problem.

  9. Missing Number: This problem involves finding a missing number in a sequence, which may require you to calculate the expected sum and the actual sum of the numbers, akin to the way you need to calculate maximum distances in the original problem.

  10. Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock: In this problem, you have to find the maximum profit by choosing a day to buy a stock and a different day in the future to sell the stock. The concept of maintaining a ‘minimum’ value as you iterate through the array to eventually find a ‘maximum’ value is similar to the original problem.

These problems involve a similar iterative, comparative, and sometimes mathematical approach as was used in our original problem.